Comments on: Not a Hack: Paramore’s Hayley Williams TwitPic’d her topless picture herself (PICS!)

By: awesomestguy

awesomestguy — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:38:00 +0000

Wow, I can’t believe how utter trash that was. You think because on the image’s data it says it was only a few minutesold means she posted it? You realize that A) That code is very easy to manipulate, and anyone with a computer could change it, and B) Its not always accurate, considering I’ve looked at the data myself and it claimed it was taken a day AFTER it was first uploaded? You realize that, every time the image is copied or moved, the data will probably change, especially when people copy and save into someplace or transfer it.
And, obviously, you haven’t done a lot of research into the subject, considering it was taken from a phone that she had lost a while BEFORE she uploaded it? Obviously, that argument holds up as much as your claim does as the data can be changed, but there’s a million possibilities for it other than that image being uploaded. Maybe it was a hacking as she said, and that she lost her phone, it was found, and uploaded using her already signed in Twitter (Which makes a LOT of sense), or alternatively, as many are claiming, she accidentally pressed the ‘upload onto twitter’ button and didn’t realize it. Yeah, its possible she did upload it on purpose, but its unlikely considering that, well, have you ever MET her? Have you ever actually seen an interview with her? She’s REALLY not the kind to purposely upload one.
And, I leave with one piece of advice which would also make you all rethink this, look carefully at her face. The skin is a different colour to the rest of her body. Think about that.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:48:00 +0000

I have no idea who the young lady is, but do you remember what a jeep was in the Popeye cartoons? Dig that nose.

By: Jamie A Grutman

Jamie A Grutman — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:26:39 +0000

win

By: John

John — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:05:11 +0000

I’d hit it.

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:11:55 +0000

So we disregard the EXIF data entirely. There is still a problem. The photo is real. Those are really Hayley’s boobs. It shows none of the signs of being a fake. So, if we argue that the EXIF data is falsified, how did some random hacker get a very real photo of Hayley’s boobs? Then, how did he ‘hack’ her twitter? Believe it or not, your average ‘hacker’ relies on the ‘hackees’ to be utterly retarded and tell him the password themselves. Otherwise, the second most common method is to know the person’s e-mail address and login name and security questions/answers and e-mail login info. It’s not easy, and Hayley is far from retarded.

The only possibilities that make sense are a)Hayley accidentally tweeted a pic she intended to send (I assume) to Chad, or b) Chad was the ‘hacker.’

A is the more likely. Take a look at the interface on a Blackberry. The buttons are right next to each other. One slip and oops! Now Hayley’s adorable little boobies are all over the internet.

By: hushap

hushap — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:31:07 +0000

womens nipples are sensored for a reason. that pic is not art. as an artist i can tell evryone that nipples/penis dont have 2 be sensored if the persons attention is elswhere, calm expression (unless the art was meant 2 express pain), and the person would not have 2 be ‘wide open’ they would have 2 b obviously naked, but the main attention of the art elsewhere. this aint art. she even said n an interview she wouldnt do a magazine nude shoot. even christians are hormonal. like the late michael jackson said

By: Jahm Mitt

Jahm Mitt — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:34:19 +0000

As a side thought, yeah she is cute, fuckable, nice tits etc… but what is with the “CENSORED” stamp across the nipples? I mean for the last 5 million years we have had tits and no one ever gave the big hush job cover up, until idiots decided that womens nipples are “conveniently offensive” (sometimes) and men’s are not.

By: JC

JC — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:36:05 +0000

Clutching at straws there, I think

By: Angie

Angie — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:20:15 +0000

You dont know..maybe that hacker had speedy hands..or just shortcuts, their smarter than smart itself.

By: jayjayjj50

jayjayjj50 — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:04:01 +0000

Its was a clear mistake on here part. Some hacked her account and yet she was still able to log into her account moments later. Any hacker would have change the password the moment the account was hack.